| bank on Thu, 28 Dec 95 19:43 MET |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| zk-proceedings 95 |
1) select genre: **essays
2) select max size (20K)
3) select txt (ASCII)
4) send it to nettime@is.in-berlin.de (if done yet then please ->contact)
>From hypertext utopias to cooperative net-projects
By Heiko Idensen
The explosive expansion of the WWW changed the use of hypertext-programs and
concepts: from artistic and academic experiments in the seventies to a new kind of
network-hyper-media.
But what happend to the utopias of hypertext by the way?
- Did all readers become writers?
- Are avantgarde techniques in literature and art now available for all users?
- What about poetics/ethics within networks?
Visualizations and dramatizations of data presentations, simulation techniques,
desktop publishing, desktop video, the hypertext revolution of the WWW ... make the
screen as a virtual surface the favourite place of cultural exchange processes:
on screen thinking - writing and reading on the net.
Connected
The post-modern technologies and sciences leave human beings behind as nomads
hooked up to the network of telematic multimedial systems: culturally imprinted
by the alphabetic book-culture, informed, seduced, and emotionally fed by audio-
visual mass media, mentally stimulated, fascinated and inspired to speculations
and visions by the new information technologies.
The myths of the text society - finite text, authorship, legitimization in the
context of "great stories" (ideologies) - collapse in the interfaces of the
information media, in the circulation of endlessly interchangeable information
particles: texts, pictures, sounds are floating through information channels ...
networking as an art of cross connections, of being on the way, of being
everywhere. ... nomadic interwoven cultural techniques arise ...
Everything can be connected to everything!
The classic separations between production and reception (e.g. between author,
text, and reader or of code, sender, and receiver) will be abolished in favour of a
text-network-conception:
In active processes of intertextual generating of texts from texts, images from
images, media from and within other media ..., reading and writing will overlap.
The making of references substitutes the conventional receiving and sending of
media documents.
Media Networks contrary to the linear-sequential writing of printed texts,
electronic documents are divided in small, discrete units: the screen, the card of a
hypertext system, one data record of a data base, the text, image or action window
of an object oriented working surface, a message on the board of a mailbox ... have
manifolds relations with each other. The network of such objects of ideas and
mental images requires from the beginning a multiperspective way of organisation
- a networked thinking which allows different approaches and connections.
One doesn't read texts anymore, one doesn't see pictures anymore, one doesn't
listen to soundscapes anymore ... instead, one cuts together various media streams
on-line (in real-time) - not only as chance mixtures - as, for example, in early
multi-media happenings - but rather as integral constellations and configurations:
Networking Hypertexts as "text's" late revenge on television and the audio-visual
media-massage.
HYPER-Media-Culture
Although the apparative preconditions for the networking of various media are
becoming ever more complex, artistic (non-affirmative) methods of using such
networked systems are only slowly beginning to evolve.
The artistic paradises of hyper-media, in contrast to the analogue media (writing,
film, radio, TV), are no longer metaphorical representational machines: they refer
to nothing, but are simply waiting for our input, actions and reactions.
Although the radical media transition from gramophone, film, typewriter (thus
Friedrich Kittler's suggestive title) to CD, video and computers has radically
changed the personal, cultural and political parameters of information processes -
the foundations of literary culture (authorship, copyright, work- and product
character of the media documents exchanged ...) are only now beginning to tremble
with the rapid spread of digital media: The techniques and practises of non-linear
forms of living, thinking, and production are now becoming standard operations
with, through, over, under and around the new media ...
The place of knowledge and culture production thereby shifts to externalised
networks of the most varied of media configurations. The "classical" (manipulated
or to be mobilised) bourgeois or mass media produced public no longer exists - the
question of media connections, of networking, sequencing and interrelating the
"charges" (mixtures of texts, images, sounds, interactions) circulating in the
network will become decisive for a tele-political culture - for the networked
circulation of public images, texts and multi-media.
Hyper-Media-Utopias
Hyper-media offers places to jump from, information nodes, intensification,
network addresses, fragments, that must be used, stolen, traversed, "fed". Taken on
their own they mean nothing. Hypermedia documents cannot be simply
"transmitted" or "received" - they contain activating moments, invitations to
manipulate the syntax and structure of the media, to discover new worlds, micro-
spaces and real-time-environments, extensions beyond the raster and resolution of
the monitors:
- multicultural and interdisciplinary exchange of texts, images, sounds as opposed
to the one-dimensional set channels of the mass communication media
- the development of a world wide network, a common electronic writing
environment as the preliminary model for a hyper-media-culture
- thinking as travelling through information networks
- free access to networks, archives, data banks, media ...
The poetry should be created by everyone!
Network-Utopias
Each utopia is a network.
There are closed networks (religion, meditation, the aura of classical art, the book
as a closed text, mass media...) and open ones (love affairs, social utopias, open
artworks that allow participation, ecological cycles, the telephone system and
naturally, digitalized telematic nets, open texts, interaction, hypertexts). Social
networks can be found in artist groups and communities (Cobra, Fluxus,
Situationists) as well as in the many initiatives of the counterculture since 1968
(from food co-operatives, communes, neighbourhood groups, neighbourly help, to
media co-operatives and socio-cultural centres). Nonetheless, it would be false to
think that the Net-Work-Concept as such has an utopian character - the "System"
(totalitarian or technocratic state, the bourgeoisie, the family etc.) is after all,
also a complex network of dispositions: transmission, storage, distribution, and
control mechanisms. Only a very specific use of networks can be utopian: (Network
"radio" for example is employed by fascism as the central distribution unit for
propaganda, while in the revolutionary struggle of the Tuparamos, it was used as a
mobile guerrilla communication system - central "fascist" grouping of
transmissions versus rhizomatic, nomadic networks.)
Cartography
"What distinguishes the map from the tracing is that it is entirely oriented toward
an experimentation in contact with the real. The map does not reproduce an
unconscious closed in upon itself; it constructs the unconscious. It fosters
connections between fields, the removal of blockages on bodies without organs,
the maximum opening of bodies without organs onto a plane of consistency. It is
itself a part of the rhizome. The map is open and connectable in all of its
dimensions; it is detachable, reversible, susceptible to constant modification. It
can be torn, reversed, adapted to an kind of mounting, reworked by an individual,
group, or social formation. It can be drawn on a wall, conceived as a work of art,
constructed as a political action or as a meditation. Perhaps one of the most
important characteristics of the rhizome is that it always has multiple
entryways..."
(Deleuze/Guattari: A Thousand Plateaus, p. 12)
tap in
The encyclopaedia projected the classical tree of knowledge onto a map, in order
to show connecting lines and crossing points between the various disciplines.
These concepts will be further developed into methods to interrelate and process
idea-objects on the surfaces of information processing environments.
Experimental literary methods such as Cut-up, intertextual connections,
interlockings, visualisations invade the realm of knowledge as discursive methods,
speed up the general circulation and the confluence of information from various
areas, create connective possibilities and interfaces to other areas of knowledge.
Short circuits and interferences between discourses turn into productive fields, in
which discoveries, inventions and innovations take place.
Thought itself happens in the spaces between, in the transition zone from one area
to another. The process of transport and transfer of hypermedia develops through
tapping into the information particles circulating in the network.
Media Myth
Especially today, after the presumed failure of social utopias and projects, utopian
potentials are increasingly pushing their way into technologies and media:
ecological technologies, recreation and psychological technologies, body and
aesthetic technologies... While the mechanical age sang an ode in a myriad of
variations to the myth of the machine as the universal instrument of production,
the post-modern age delivers the myth of the Universal Network: the telematic
technologies promise a liberalization, multiplication, and enrichment of the
methods of communication. Social systems as open networks in which the
messages flow out star-like in all directions - the myth is no longer "The medium
is the message", but "The medium is the network!
The myth was first a narration, then a statement, now the network itself...
Subversive Use of Media
The dream of a critical theory of media: to tear the commodity character from the
media, so that they can be put to a communicative, social use - from the capitalist
application to the revolutionary subversive practise of miss-application, since the
structure of media is "fundamentally egalitarian" (from a distribution to a "real
communication tool"...). This is, however, not a technical problem but rather one of
the networking of medial connections, social relationships, artistic forms of
production, run of the mill daily practices...
Reference Systems
It is true that the telematic utopias resemble all too closely the promises of the
free market, free elections, or media feed-back mechanisms such as reader
submissions, listener telephone calls, questionnaires: "minimal effort on the part
of voters/viewers" (Enzensberger 70, 161), whereby, however, the answers are
already present in the questions.
The telematic-cybernetic illusion: everyone can switch from the status of
recipient to the status of transmitter, to become the active operator of their
mental constructs! However, the model of social mass communication doesn't
change at all if the users of telematic networks can only alternate from the status
of recipient to the status of transmitter, without destroying the immanent
implicit reference and code structures of media systems.
Therefore, hypertext-systems that only allow for stripped-down, read-only
versions of electronic documents are also completely unacceptable. This implies
the complete disposability of all texts in the network for collaborative writing
projects: Everyone can enter at any point, delete, enter text, interconnect ...
Answers...
Artistic telematic projects go beyond the conventional dialectic of transmission
and reception; therefore they change the code, the message, the technological
structure and the social contexts in which these things operate. The network as
utopian potential, is therefore not the simple knotting together of that which
circulates through existing telematic networks, but rather the network/the
matrix/the tissue/the rhizome as a model, as texture, as form, program, activity,
way of telling, way of living... Moments of immediate, unheralded connections,
references, cross-references, new forms of a symbolic exchange, that is
completely unfiltered by any social, languistic, bureaucratic, commercial norms -
no transmitter and receiver, but rather, people who respond to each other...
Rhizome - Network
Through nomadic wandering in telematic networks, centrallized systems (like the
branching model of trees and roots) are converted into de-centralized systems, "in
which communication is established between neighbours, in which streams and
channels have no previous existence (...)" (Deleuze/Guattari 92, 30). Writing in the
network has nothing to do with literature in the classical sense - as in the system
author-work-meaning-market, - but rather with surveying virgin land in the
telematic domain, establishing landscapes of text, even to understand writing and
reading as a nomadic act of wandering through text-networks!
The additional dimensions of the hyper-textual tailoring of random text particles
that circulate among various mailboxes through permanent up and downloading,
liberate the mental effort of producing texts as a social network. These text
particles can be interrupted, ripped apart, altered (and sent again) in any position -
while being simultaneously held together in a variable network while constantly
referring to each other.
On-line-Writing
Writing (as ecriture in the poetic sense, as activity, as doing, as generation...)
takes place (already) always 'on-line': hooked up to the projection apparatus (of a
writing system) the writing process constantly switches back and forth between
transmission/reception, remembering/forgetting, continuation/termination ...
The processes of structuring, revision, of setting in contexts (repetitions,
recursions, the interlocking of phrases, casual events ...) that take place in the
minds (or on the margin of the manuscript, between the lines of a proof copy ...) of
individual authors, are already happening now in the public domain: distributed
collective - collaborative de-sign, development-processing of text in the truest
sense of the word.
Perhaps in such a net-work of interterchange it is no longer important who has
written something but rather where it has been written, to what it relates, how it
is distributed in the networks, what replies it elicits ...
Text, Collective
The utopian vision of a collective TEXTUALITY: as already found in socially
turbulent situations (French revolution, operative writer collectives in the Russian
revolution ...) and in communal text-net-works. But neither the encyclopaedia, nor
literary circles (Nouveau Romanciers, Tel-Quel) really eliminate the bourgeois
author-subject, even when this belongs to the central demands of the respective
literary program! Perhaps this is really (operatively) a question of the technology
of writing (recording and distribution): There is neither room for a signature
("signature" is the file with a personal farewell greeting which can be added to a
mail-message), nor the necessary consistency of information to provide
conventional authorship. That which applies theoretically and conceptually to
written literature - in the system of literature as an inter-textual network -
applies also to the net-work-text-tours at every moment of
generation/structuring and distribution: The difference between writing and
reading in the network is approaching nil.
Utopia Telematics
Travel routes, departure and arrival points draw tracks, paths, and traffic routes,
mark nodes, bases and cities in the landscapes of telematic networks. With each
journey, each on-line adventure, the network of interconnections expands... If these
communicative connections, communication acts, up and down-loads, acts of
sending and receiving ... combine with object oriented hypertext programs, then the
most disparate data forms, information carriers, cultural production forms mix on
a communal surface: the utopian vision of a comprehensive telematic network, in
which the forms of individual production change into social communication.
Rhizome
"The rhizome is altogether different, a map and not a tracing. Make a map, not a
tracing... "
(Deleuze/Guattari: A Thousand Plateaus, p. 12)
European Diary
A Network-Project addresses precisely this space in between
power/powerlessness, centre/periphery, private/public - the personal form of the
diary is written directly into the network: starting from the "Zagreb Diary", in
which the Dutchman Wam Kat makes public via computer networks his personal
impressions of the events of the war in the former Yugoslavia, personal entries,
subjective stories and experiences are collected and compiled in networks
throughout Europe - and thereby opposed to the always repetitive news agency
reports of the official media and information structures.
POETRONIC (Peter Glaser) has taken on the translations and co-ordination of this
project which can be found on news-Servers in the directory T-Netz / Tagebuch or
in local Mail-Boxes (e.g. //BIONIC (Bielefeld): germany /0521/68000):
Those who wish to participate can send contributions to the Board /T-
NETZ/TAGEBUCH.
Word3-Voices
"First, a quick word about the structure of World 3. We've tried to
design the space to reflect one of the most remarkable attributes
of hypertext. Namely, its ability to connect ideas, to draw
analogies, to create intelligence.
The decidedly non-linear Deus Ludens or "No Thought Is More Than
One Connection From Any Other" weighs in with some heavy concepts
(heck, we're talking Big Ideas here!) about the nature of
cyberspace. Think of it as metahypertext. One Thought."
W3 Voices: http://www.rezn8.com/world3/meme1/vioces.html
C.R.E.W.
Compact for Responsive Electronic Writing
"Preamble
We believe in Hypermedia and the World Wide Web ...
Hyperdocuments are not simply Collections of Nodes and Links, but Articulations of
Nodes and Links in Space ...
... the Space of Hypermedia is not the Space of the Book ...
We feel "the need to use computer networks as a means for creating new forms of
collective intelligence, of getting humans to interact with one another in novel
ways" (De Landa) ...
It's better to do it than to write about it.
What is C.R.E.W.?
Compact for Responsive Electronic Writing: a non-binding, strictly
symbolic agreement among World Wide Web authors promising to open
their documents to links proposed by others in the community.
Why bother?
Because presently the World Wide Web is more like a gigantic index than a
true hypertext system. Hypertext requires the ability to create links as well
as follow them.
The CREW Preamble: http://raven.ubalt.edu/crew/Preamble.html
WAXweb (http://bug.village.virginia.edu/)
is the hypermedia version of David Blair's feature-length independent
film, "WAX or the discovery of television among the bees" (85:00, 1991). It
combines one of the largest hypermedia narrative databases on the Internet with
an authoring interface which allows users to collaboratively add to the story.
Hi Pitched Voices
(http://duke.cs.brown.edu:8888/viewer=sav/lang=English/obj=2430)
A collaborative WWW-Hypertext work in the "Hypertext- Hotel" (at Brown
University, where you find a lot of hypertext-projects).
Some kind of MOO-inspired collaction of "voices", which inspire further wandering
within their often meanderings.
Imaginary Library
* All texts (sorry, mostly in german language!), projects, bibliographies of the
project PooL-Processing are part of the "Imaginary Library":
http://www.uni-hildesheim.de/ami/pool/home.html
(some kind of literary micro-model of a hypertext-docuverse like the WWW.
"Literature is an ongoing system of interconnecting documents."(Ted Nelson)
** more links to cooperative hypertext projects:
http://www.uni-hildesheim.de/ami/pool/AAO.html
*** email Heiko Idensen:100762.2560@compuserve.com
connect it!
Find the places in the network that you can do something with. Copy the
material, scan it, import it, work with it...
Wunschmaschinen (Machines of Desire)
The wishing machines aren't stuck in our heads, are not figments of the
imagination, but exist in the technical and social machines themselves.
(Gilles Deleuze; Felix Guattari)